Home ›

Comment on ROCKS / SUCKS: The New Mashable by Nater Kane

Posted September 8th, 2008 by Anonymous

Rocks vs. Sucks is a bit drastic. C’mon now. Maybe the availability of the redesign could have been managed differently, ie. 10% of users get the new design for a week, then across that week, do some analytics and userpath tracking work ...

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Yahoo

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.